Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Poon, E. G.
space
  arrow  Gandhi, T. K.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

IMPROVING PATIENT CARE

Medication Dispensing Errors and Potential Adverse Drug Events before and after Implementing Bar Code Technology in the Pharmacy

right arrow Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH; Jennifer L. Cina, PharmD; William Churchill, MS; Nirali Patel, PharmD; Erica Featherstone, BS; Jeffrey M. Rothschild, MD, MPH; Carol A. Keohane, BSN, RN; Anthony D. Whittemore, MD; David W. Bates, MD, MSc; and Tejal K. Gandhi, MD, MPH

19 September 2006 | Volume 145 Issue 6 | Pages 426-434

Background: Many dispensing errors made in hospital pharmacies can harm patients. Some hospitals are investing in bar code technology to reduce these errors, but data about its efficacy are limited.

Objective: To evaluate whether implementation of bar code technology reduced dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).

Design: Before-and-after study using direct observations.

Setting: Hospital pharmacy at a 735-bed tertiary care academic medical center.

Intervention: A bar code–assisted dispensing system was implemented in 3 configurations. In 2 configurations, all doses were scanned once during the dispensing process. In the third configuration, only 1 dose was scanned if several doses of the same medication were being dispensed.

Measurements: Target dispensing errors, defined as dispensing errors that bar code technology was designed to address, and target potential ADEs, defined as target dispensing errors that can harm patients.

Results: In the pre– and post–bar code implementation periods, the authors observed 115 164 and 253 984 dispensed medication doses, respectively. Overall, the rates of target potential ADEs and all potential ADEs decreased by 74% and 63%, respectively. Of the 3 configurations of bar code technology studied, the 2 configurations that required staff to scan all doses had a 93% to 96% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and 86% to 97% relative reduction in the incidence of potential ADEs (P < 0.001). However, the configuration that did not require scanning of every dose had only a 60% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and an increased (by 2.4-fold) incidence of target potential ADEs (P = 0.014). There were several potentially life-threatening ADEs involving intravenous dopamine and intravenous heparin in that configuration.

Limitations: The authors used surrogate outcomes; did not mask assessors to the purpose of study; and excluded the controlled substance fill process (a process with low error rates at baseline) from the study, which may bias the combined decrease in error rates toward a larger magnitude.

Conclusions: The overall rates of dispensing errors and potential ADEs substantially decreased after implementing bar code technology. However, the technology should be configured to scan every dose during the dispensing process.


Editors' Notes
space

Context

  • Bar code technology could help reduce medication dispensing errors in the pharmacy.

Contribution

  • The authors observed hospital pharmacy technicians as they dispensed medications before and after the installation of a storage and retrieval system that used bar code technology to label medications. After implementation of the bar code–based system, dispensing errors were much less frequent if the system required scanning of all dispensed doses. Some errors actually increased if the system did not require scanning every dose.

Cautions

  • Bar code technology was only one part of an entirely redesigned medication storage and dispensing system.

Implications

  • Properly implemented, medication storage and dispensing systems that use bar code technology may help to reduce medication dispensing errors.

—The Editors

 

Author and Article Information
space

From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Partners Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Judy Hayes, RN, and Anne Bane, RN, for their support throughout the project; E. John Orav, PhD, for his editorial comments and assistance with statistical analyses; and Brandon Hays and Robin Johnson for their assistance with data analysis.

Grant Support: By the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS14053-02).

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Consultancies: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health); Honoraria: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health); Grants received: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health).

Requests for Single Reprints: Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02120; e-mail, epoon{at}partners.org.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Poon, Rothschild, Bates, and Gandhi; Ms. Featherstone; and Ms. Keohane: Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02120.

Drs. Cina and Patel and Mr. Churchill: Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02120.

Dr. Whittemore: Administration Building, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02120.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
C. A. Pedersen and K. F. Gumpper
ASHP national survey on informatics: Assessment of the adoption and use of pharmacy informatics in U.S. hospitals--2007
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2008; 65(23): 2244 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
R. Koppel, T. Wetterneck, J. L. Telles, and B.-T. Karsh
Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 408 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
E N de Vries, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma, and M A Boermeester
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 216 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. W. Cescon and E. Etchells
Barcoded Medication Administration: A Last Line of Defense
JAMA, May 14, 2008; 299(18): 2200 - 2202.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
B. Greenwood, P. M. Szumita, and M. Pendergrass
Conversion to insulin devices in the inpatient setting
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2008; 65(8): 698 - 699.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
J. Karnon, A. McIntosh, J. Dean, P. Bath, A. Hutchinson, J. Oakley, N. Thomas, P. Pratt, L. Freeman-Parry, B.-T. Karsh, et al.
Modelling the expected net benefits of interventions to reduce the burden of medication errors
J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
F. H. Morriss Jr
Adverse Medical Events in the NICU: Epidemiology and Prevention
NeoReviews, January 1, 2008; 9(1): e8 - e23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
F. FitzHenry, J. F. Peterson, M. Arrieta, L. R. Waitman, J. S. Schildcrout, and R. A. Miller
Medication Administration Discrepancies Persist Despite Electronic Ordering
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 756 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. Fanikos, A. Erickson, K. E. Munz, M. D. Sanborn, B. C. Ludwig, and T. Van Hassel
Observations on the use of ready-to-use and point-of-care activated parenteral products in automated dispensing cabinets in U.S. hospitals
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2007; 64(19): 2037 - 2043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
M. I. Harrison, R. Koppel, and S. Bar-Lev
Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 542 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
L. C. Vermeulen, S. S. Rough, T. S. Thielke, R. R. Shane, M. F. Ivey, B. W. Woodward, P. G. Pierpaoli, S. M. Thomley, C. A. Borr, and D. A. Zilz
Strategic approach for improving the medication-use process in health systems: The high-performance pharmacy practice framework
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 15, 2007; 64(16): 1699 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
D. W. Bates
Preventing medication errors: A summary
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2007; 64(14_Supplement_9): S3 - S9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. M. Maviglia, J. Y. Yoo, C. Franz, E. Featherstone, W. Churchill, D. W. Bates, T. K. Gandhi, and E. G. Poon
Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Hospital Pharmacy Bar Code Solution
Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 788 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2006 by the American College of Physicians.