Officials see internet as a distraction for students
Primary Topic Channel: Instruction
|
|
University of Chicago Law School officials have a simple message for their students: less web surfing, more listening.
The school announced April 11 that the distractions afforded by wireless internet access no longer will be available during class time, although laptops still will be permitted for note taking.
The move comes as educators at schools and universities nationwide have struggled with how to keep students on task at a time when most have personal technology devices they bring to class. Although many professors have taken steps to block internet access during their instruction, the University of Chicago Law School is believed to be among the first to implement a school-wide ban.
Saul Levmore, dean of the Chicago law school, said the decision was an easy one.
When officials discovered they could turn off wireless access in classrooms, "we felt that we ought to move in that direction," Levmore said.
Professors at law schools across the country said web-less classrooms have not been students' favorite policy, but some University of Chicago students supported Levmore's decision.
"What makes our law school is our faculty," Peter Rock Ternes, a second-year Chicago law school student, said in a statement. "I think it makes sense to encourage focusing on them and on the classroom discussions."
Banning internet access in classrooms, Levmore said, would restore basic rules of politeness and professional etiquette between students and professors.
"When a student visits my office, neither the student nor I would dream of surfing the web or eMailing while communicating with one another," he said. "That is the level of attention and engagement we should expect in the classroom. Our overarching goal is to have a terrific and interesting classroom experience—that is too important to allow diversions."
Levmore emphasized his point in a recent letter to law students.
"We need to think of internet business as inappropriate in the classroom, much as everyone recognizes the need to shut off cell phones and to refrain from ostentatious newspaper reading in class or at business meetings or at Thanksgiving dinner," Levmore wrote.
Many law schools have given professors the choice of banning wireless access or laptops altogether. A professor at Harvard Law School who did not want her name published in this article said disallowing laptops has cultivated class discussion and student participation.
"Students have never complained about it, and if anything, they say the classroom environment is vastly improved," the professor said. "And I find the students listen to each other more."
While internet access opens the door for myriad distractions, allowing students to type notes on their laptop has essentially transformed students into stenographers as they type furiously, "just transcribing everything that's going on," the Harvard law professor said.
Address the symptoms. . .
Taking internet away does not take distractions away. Laptops can still play games. iPhones and Blackberry's can still access the internet. Small slips of paper can still be used to doodle/pass notes. Pens can be tapped. Distractions have always existed and will always exist. Taking away what is fast becoming a necessary technology in contemporary classrooms is just plain foolish. These professors may not see the need for constant internet access in their classrooms right now, but they are teaching to people who have a completely different mindset regarding these technologies. And subject matter such as law should be prepared to take advantage of the fact that they can get up the minute information. As technology, especially 'net based technology, expands and develops, the classroom needs to learn to use these tools to their advantage, not shut them down entirely.
Posted By: haefs, 2008-05-06 10:18 AM
Ridiculous idea
Being able to manage technology and communicate effectively are traits that every professional in today's economy must possess. It doesn't matter if that professional is a lawyer, a teacher, or the guy working behind the deli counter. I'm sure none of us have "ostentatiously" read a newspaper in a meeting, but we probably have all received email, IM'd colleagues, etc. while in a meeting. Does that mean we don't respect our boss or the meeting? No. It means that we are effectively managing our time in order to increase productivity. The bottom line is that the students need to be responsible enough to manage their ability to multi-task. It shouldn't be the responsiblity of the school. Businesses don't turn off internet access during meetings, so the school shouldn't turn it off during class. If I were an educator, I'd find out why students felt that browsing the web was more engaging than my lecture. I'd then incorporate more of that into my own classroom.
Posted By: troyt, 2008-05-05 3:57 PM
Who is paying for this education?
While this may make sense from a professor's perspective, who may consider it unprofessional, it is still an infringement on the students' perspective. First of all, these students are considered adults. They are ultimately paying for this education, and if they wish not to participate, that is their perogative. Colleges forget who their customers are. It isn't the professors and teachers; it is the students. Students' behavior will show up in the final analysis: if you don't pay attention, then you won't pass the class, and you may not graduate.
Posted By: plepley, 2008-05-02 3:53 PM
Integrating technology
I fully agree with dimedio. Also, it might be wise for the administration to integrate technology into the given curriculum. After all, attorneys of the future will probably need it for their work to be competitive.
Posted By: tizmedia, 2008-05-02 3:08 PM
Good Idea
As lawyers they need to learn to communicate and be alert. I would not hire a lawyer that could only communicate in net.
Posted By: mnace, 2008-05-02 2:49 PM
Integrating technology
Perhaps the university should promote more student centered learning that focuses on collaboration, team building, research, critical thinking rather than teacher directed lecture and note taking. This is the 21st Century and technology should be a given in classrooms.
Posted By: dimedio, 2008-05-02 1:59 PM
|
You need to be registered at eSchoolnews.com to add your comments. If you do not have a username / password please register here ! Registration is very simple and will not take much time! |





Comment now.

They aint lawyers yet!
This "multi-tasking" blather barely works for people who are proficient at what they do. What we have here are people still learning to be lawyers. Put the toys away, wade into the discussion. Be part of the "learned discourse" not a typing robot. This is what the profs mean. I think they're right on the money. I've been at way too many meetings where the mental presence was muti-tasked right out of the room and nothing was accomplished.
Posted By: alienmouse, 2008-05-07 3:53 PM